Protein structure prediction and de novo protein design in 2026: overview
Protein structure prediction estimates a protein’s three-dimensional shape from its amino acid sequence, while de novo design creates proteins for specified structures or functions. Together, these computational methods help researchers study biological mechanisms and propose molecules for experimental testing. Deep learning has made structure modeling more accessible, but accurate predictions are not the same as functional proteins: stability, activity, binding and performance in real biological settings still need validation.
Recent work is bringing design closer to those practical tests. In September 2026, Zhejiang University of Technology researchers reported HighMorph, an interaction-guided method for cyclic-peptide sequence design, while Shanghai JiaoTong University researchers described a binder for [NiFe]-hydrogenase. NVIDIA’s September 2026 BioNeMo integration with Claude Science points to more connected prediction workflows. Across these directions, the field is moving from static structures toward function-aware design, with experimental screening and protein dynamics helping address the gap between computational candidates and useful molecules.
- 1Design is accelerating: Generative design and sequence-based design are gaining momentum, with activity growth of 45.5% and 51.7%, respectively.
- 2Function is the test: Recent work on enzyme activity, binders and cyclic peptides highlights the need to optimize for biological performance, not just a plausible fold.
- 3Prediction keeps expanding: Deep-learning structure prediction remains a major approach, while protein dynamics and complex modeling extend the field beyond single static structures.
Top organizations working on protein structure prediction and de novo protein design
Ranked by Linknovate activity score · last 24 monthsThe activity score adds up the relevance of every patent, publication, grant and news item linking an organization to protein structure prediction and de novo protein design. Showing 7 of 2,905 organizations.
| # | Organization | Approach | Signals (24 mo) | Momentum | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Google DeepMind
Corporate · United Kingdom |
Deep-learning structure prediction | PAT 3 · PUB 8 NEWS 1,090 |
-31% | Recently, Google DeepMind disbanded its AlphaFold team and reassigned some members as the organization shifts priorities. AlphaFold established its role in AI-based protein structure prediction. |
| 2 |
University of Washington
Research · United States |
Generative design | PAT 3 · PUB 170 NEWS 258 |
-26% | University of Washington researchers work on computational protein design and structure prediction, including de novo design of proteins and binders. |
| 3 |
University of California
Research · United States |
Generative design | PUB 221 · NEWS 24 | +31% | University of California researchers apply computational design to new protein binders, antibodies, biosensors, and other functional proteins. |
| 4 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Research · United States |
Generative design | PAT 2 · PUB 73 NEWS 153 |
-2% | Recently, MIT researchers advanced methods for modeling protein sequence–energy landscapes and predicting the effects of mutations. Its work also explores generative design with joint optimization of protein structure and sequence. |
| 5 |
Chinese Academy of Sciences CAS
Research · China |
Generative design | PUB 146 · NEWS 23 | +25% | Recently, Chinese Academy of Sciences researchers reported a co-evolution-guided strategy to improve enzyme stability and catalytic performance. Their work also applies computational de novo design to peptides and proteins. |
| 6 |
Stanford University
Research · United States |
Sequence-based design | PAT 1 · PUB 103 NEWS 107 |
+29% | Recently, Stanford researchers designed orthogonal fluorophore-binding proteins for multiplexed imaging. Their work also includes Caliby, an ensemble-conditioned model for designing protein sequences to match target structures. |
| 7 |
Harvard University
Research · United States |
Generative design | PUB 93 · NEWS 91 | +30% | Recently, Harvard researchers used AI-based sequence design to improve starting points and outcomes in protein evolution. Their work also includes de novo peptide modulators and miniprotein inhibitors. |
| 8 | ··Hidden organizationCompany | Approach | PAT 00 · PUB 00 GRANTS 0 · NEWS 00 | +00% | Available to registered users. |
| 9 | ··Hidden organizationCompany | Approach | PAT 00 · PUB 00 GRANTS 0 · NEWS 00 | +00% | Available to registered users. |
| 10 | ··Hidden organizationCompany | Approach | PAT 00 · PUB 00 GRANTS 0 · NEWS 00 | +00% | Available to registered users. |
Startups to watch and leading research centers
Startups to watch 56 total
Generate Biomedicines IncUnited StatesGenerate Biomedicines has patented a diffusion-model system for de novo protein generation, using design conditions and modular energy functions to specify desired protein properties.
A Alpha Bio Inc.United StatesRecently, A-Alpha Bio launched Atlas, a platform for protein-interaction data. Its quantitative, high-throughput measurements can support modeling and engineering of protein–protein interactions.
Profluent Bio Inc.United StatesProfluent develops AI methods for protein design and has filed patent claims covering protein-sequence design systems and engineered antibody sequences.- ··Hidden startupCountryAvailable to registered users, with funding and founding year.
- ··Hidden startupCountryAvailable to registered users, with funding and founding year.
Leading research institutions 2,466 total
University of WashingtonUnited StatesUniversity of Washington researchers work on computational protein design and structure prediction, including de novo design of proteins and binders.
University of CaliforniaUnited StatesUniversity of California researchers apply computational design to new protein binders, antibodies, biosensors, and other functional proteins.
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUnited StatesRecently, MIT researchers advanced methods for modeling protein sequence–energy landscapes and predicting the effects of mutations. Its work also explores generative design with joint optimization of protein structure and sequence.- ··Hidden research institutionCountryAvailable to registered users, with their key researchers.
- ··Hidden research institutionCountryAvailable to registered users, with their key researchers.
Where protein structure prediction and de novo protein design innovation happens
Share of documents with at least one organization from each country.
Open the interactive map with all 2,905 organizationsMain technical approaches
Last 24 months| Approach | What it is | Documents | Leading organizations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Template-based modeling | Uses related proteins as structural templates; it can be reliable when close matches exist but is limited for novel folds. | 849 |
Google DeepMind, Nvidia, University of California |
| Physics-based folding | Searches for structures favored by physical energy models; it offers mechanistic insight but can be computationally demanding. | 510 |
Rosetta, University of Washington, Google DeepMind |
| Deep-learning structure prediction | Learns structural patterns from protein data; it predicts many structures effectively but may miss dynamics or unusual states. | 7,901 |
Google DeepMind, Google, University of Washington |
| Generative design | Generates candidate protein structures or backbones for desired goals; candidates still require sequence design and experimental validation. | 2,418 |
University of Washington, Biodesign Research, Google DeepMind |
| Sequence-based design | Finds amino acid sequences compatible with a target structure; sequence fit does not guarantee the desired function or stability. | 1,042 |
Google DeepMind, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Zhejiang University |
Emerging trends
Last 12 months vs previous 36 monthsTerms whose frequency in the last 12 months grew the most compared with the previous 36 months.
Funding and investment
Recent funding rounds
Recorded grant funding since 2020 totals $173,599,290 across 210 grants.
Patent landscape
Top patent holders · last 24 monthsRecent developments
Latest news, duplicates removed- Sep 2026NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has announced the integration of its BioNeMo Agent Toolkit with Anthropic’s Claude Science AI workbench, enabling advanced protein structure prediction workflows. This collaboration leverages…Blockchain News
- Aug 2026Via mindstudio.ai Anthropic’s Claude autonomously designs protein binders, achieving 27% hit rate The AI company's new Claude Science platform integrates over 60 scientific databases to handle end-to-end protein design…Crypto Briefing
- Aug 2026Subscribe to Anthropic Science Features on AI-assisted discoveries, practical workflows, and field notes across the sciences. Summary: In this post, we share two results that show how Claude can help life scientists…Home \ Anthropic
- Jul 2026Citation: Greener JG (2026) Where next for structural bioinformatics? PLoS Biol 24(7): e3003903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003903 Published: July 27, 2026 Copyright: © 2026 Joe G. Greener. This is an open…PLOS Biology
- Month 20XXHidden developmentAvailable to registered users with alerts enabled.
Frequently asked questions about protein structure prediction and de novo protein design
What companies are working on protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?
Google DeepMind and Nvidia are major corporate players; startup names include Generate Biomedicines Inc, A Alpha Bio Inc., and Profluent Bio Inc. Google DeepMind is associated with deep-learning structure prediction, while Generate Biomedicines and Profluent develop generative protein-design methods. A Alpha Bio launched Atlas, a platform for protein-interaction data.
Which protein structure prediction and de novo protein design startups are promising in 2026?
Generate Biomedicines Inc, A Alpha Bio Inc., and Profluent Bio Inc. are identified startups in this field. Generate Biomedicines has patented a diffusion-model system for de novo protein generation. A Alpha Bio launched Atlas in July 2026 to provide protein-interaction data, while Profluent develops AI methods for protein and antibody sequence design.
Which universities and research centers lead protein structure prediction and de novo protein design research?
The University of Washington, University of California, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology are prominent research organizations in the field. Recent work also comes from Shanghai JiaoTong University and Zhejiang University. Their reported directions include generative design, sequence design, protein binders, inverse folding, and joint optimization of protein structure and sequence.
How much funding has protein structure prediction and de novo protein design received?
Recorded grant funding since 2020 totals $173,599,290 across 210 grants. This figure describes grant records, not a complete measure of investment in the field. The available funding-round data also includes entries that may not represent protein-design-specific financing, so it should not be treated as an equivalent total.
Who holds the most protein structure prediction and de novo protein design patents?
Genentech leads the listed patent holders with 10 patents, followed by Hoffmann-La Roche with 6. Iowa State University Research Foundation holds 4. The University of Washington, Fujitsu Limited, Nvidia, Novozymes AS, and The Regents of The University Of California each have 3 listed patents.
Is protein structure prediction and de novo protein design patent activity growing?
Patent activity is down: 142 patents were recorded in the 24-month window, with growth of -52.1%. This contrasts with publication activity, which reached 4,048 publications in the last year and grew 46.6%. The difference suggests research output is expanding faster than patenting in the measured period.
How mature is protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?
Structure prediction is an established research capability, while designing proteins that work reliably remains an active technical challenge. The field recorded 4,048 publications in the last year, up 46.6%, alongside ongoing work on function, dynamics and experimental validation. Recent design studies target practical outputs such as binders, enzymes and imaging proteins.
What are the latest developments in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?
Recent developments include HighMorph, reported by Zhejiang University of Technology in September 2026, for interaction-guided cyclic-peptide sequence design. Shanghai JiaoTong University researchers reported a de novo binder for [NiFe]-hydrogenase that same month. In September 2026, NVIDIA also announced integration of its BioNeMo Agent Toolkit with Anthropic’s Claude Science workbench.
What are the main approaches in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design, and how do they differ?
The main approaches are Template-based modeling, Physics-based folding, Deep-learning structure prediction, Generative design, and Sequence-based design. Template-based methods use related structures, while physics-based methods score conformations using energy models. Deep learning predicts structure from learned patterns; generative methods create candidates, and sequence-based design seeks sequences compatible with a target structure.
What are the applications of protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?
Documented application areas include therapeutics and drug discovery (2,093 documents), antibodies and molecular binders (1,189), industrial enzymes (754), synthetic biology and agriculture (765), and structural biology (967). These methods can help develop or study molecules with targeted properties, but proposed designs need experimental testing to establish their activity and performance.