Technology Radar›Biotechnology›Bioinformatics & AI›Protein structure prediction and de novo protein design

Protein Structure Prediction and De Novo Protein Design

Explore the methods, organizations and applications shaping protein structure prediction and de novo design. Recent work is pushing beyond static structure models toward designed proteins with specific functions.

Updated 29 September 2026Based on 28,672 documents
2.9k
Organizations active (24 mo)
+15% activity YoY
56
Startups (young or venture-backed)
49
Funding rounds (24 mo)
$622B disclosed
4k
Publications in 2025
+47% vs 2024

Protein structure prediction and de novo protein design in 2026: overview

Protein structure prediction estimates a protein’s three-dimensional shape from its amino acid sequence, while de novo design creates proteins for specified structures or functions. Together, these computational methods help researchers study biological mechanisms and propose molecules for experimental testing. Deep learning has made structure modeling more accessible, but accurate predictions are not the same as functional proteins: stability, activity, binding and performance in real biological settings still need validation.

Recent work is bringing design closer to those practical tests. In September 2026, Zhejiang University of Technology researchers reported HighMorph, an interaction-guided method for cyclic-peptide sequence design, while Shanghai JiaoTong University researchers described a binder for [NiFe]-hydrogenase. NVIDIA’s September 2026 BioNeMo integration with Claude Science points to more connected prediction workflows. Across these directions, the field is moving from static structures toward function-aware design, with experimental screening and protein dynamics helping address the gap between computational candidates and useful molecules.

  • 1Design is accelerating: Generative design and sequence-based design are gaining momentum, with activity growth of 45.5% and 51.7%, respectively.
  • 2Function is the test: Recent work on enzyme activity, binders and cyclic peptides highlights the need to optimize for biological performance, not just a plausible fold.
  • 3Prediction keeps expanding: Deep-learning structure prediction remains a major approach, while protein dynamics and complex modeling extend the field beyond single static structures.
Summary generated from Linknovate data on 29 September 2026.

Top organizations working on protein structure prediction and de novo protein design

Ranked by Linknovate activity score · last 24 months

The activity score adds up the relevance of every patent, publication, grant and news item linking an organization to protein structure prediction and de novo protein design. Showing 7 of 2,905 organizations.

#OrganizationApproachSignals (24 mo)MomentumWhy it matters
1
Google DeepMind Corporate · United Kingdom
Deep-learning structure prediction PAT 3 · PUB 8
NEWS 1,090
-31% Recently, Google DeepMind disbanded its AlphaFold team and reassigned some members as the organization shifts priorities. AlphaFold established its role in AI-based protein structure prediction.
2
University of Washington Research · United States
Generative design PAT 3 · PUB 170
NEWS 258
-26% University of Washington researchers work on computational protein design and structure prediction, including de novo design of proteins and binders.
3
University of California Research · United States
Generative design PUB 221 · NEWS 24 +31% University of California researchers apply computational design to new protein binders, antibodies, biosensors, and other functional proteins.
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research · United States
Generative design PAT 2 · PUB 73
NEWS 153
-2% Recently, MIT researchers advanced methods for modeling protein sequence–energy landscapes and predicting the effects of mutations. Its work also explores generative design with joint optimization of protein structure and sequence.
5 Generative design PUB 146 · NEWS 23 +25% Recently, Chinese Academy of Sciences researchers reported a co-evolution-guided strategy to improve enzyme stability and catalytic performance. Their work also applies computational de novo design to peptides and proteins.
6
Stanford University Research · United States
Sequence-based design PAT 1 · PUB 103
NEWS 107
+29% Recently, Stanford researchers designed orthogonal fluorophore-binding proteins for multiplexed imaging. Their work also includes Caliby, an ensemble-conditioned model for designing protein sequences to match target structures.
7
Harvard University Research · United States
Generative design PUB 93 · NEWS 91 +30% Recently, Harvard researchers used AI-based sequence design to improve starting points and outcomes in protein evolution. Their work also includes de novo peptide modulators and miniprotein inhibitors.
8
··Hidden organizationCompany
ApproachPAT 00 · PUB 00
GRANTS 0 · NEWS 00
+00%Available to registered users.
9
··Hidden organizationCompany
ApproachPAT 00 · PUB 00
GRANTS 0 · NEWS 00
+00%Available to registered users.
10
··Hidden organizationCompany
ApproachPAT 00 · PUB 00
GRANTS 0 · NEWS 00
+00%Available to registered users.
+2,898 more organizations
Including 56 startups and 2,466 universities & research centers. Filter by country, approach and maturity.

Startups to watch and leading research centers

Startups to watch 56 total

Young and venture-backed companies with the highest activity score.
  • Generate Biomedicines IncUnited StatesGenerate Biomedicines has patented a diffusion-model system for de novo protein generation, using design conditions and modular energy functions to specify desired protein properties.
  • A Alpha Bio Inc.United StatesRecently, A-Alpha Bio launched Atlas, a platform for protein-interaction data. Its quantitative, high-throughput measurements can support modeling and engineering of protein–protein interactions.
  • Profluent Bio Inc.United StatesProfluent develops AI methods for protein design and has filed patent claims covering protein-sequence design systems and engineered antibody sequences.
  • ··
    Hidden startupCountryAvailable to registered users, with funding and founding year.
  • ··
    Hidden startupCountryAvailable to registered users, with funding and founding year.
See all 56 startups, with funding and founding year

Leading research institutions 2,466 total

Ranked by publications, patents, grants and news in the last 24 months.
  • University of WashingtonUnited StatesUniversity of Washington researchers work on computational protein design and structure prediction, including de novo design of proteins and binders.
  • University of CaliforniaUnited StatesUniversity of California researchers apply computational design to new protein binders, antibodies, biosensors, and other functional proteins.
  • Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyUnited StatesRecently, MIT researchers advanced methods for modeling protein sequence–energy landscapes and predicting the effects of mutations. Its work also explores generative design with joint optimization of protein structure and sequence.
  • ··
    Hidden research institutionCountryAvailable to registered users, with their key researchers.
  • ··
    Hidden research institutionCountryAvailable to registered users, with their key researchers.
See all research groups and their key researchers

Where protein structure prediction and de novo protein design innovation happens

United States
45.9%
China
21.2%
United Kingdom
19.0%
Germany
10.0%
India
7.8%
Japan
6.1%
France
6.0%
Switzerland
4.8%
Canada
4.4%
Italy
4.3%
Rest of worldEurope

Share of documents with at least one organization from each country.

Open the interactive map with all 2,905 organizations

Main technical approaches

Last 24 months
ApproachWhat it isDocumentsLeading organizations
Template-based modelingUses related proteins as structural templates; it can be reliable when close matches exist but is limited for novel folds. 849
Google DeepMind, Nvidia, University of California
Physics-based foldingSearches for structures favored by physical energy models; it offers mechanistic insight but can be computationally demanding. 510
Rosetta, University of Washington, Google DeepMind
Deep-learning structure predictionLearns structural patterns from protein data; it predicts many structures effectively but may miss dynamics or unusual states. 7,901
Google DeepMind, Google, University of Washington
Generative designGenerates candidate protein structures or backbones for desired goals; candidates still require sequence design and experimental validation. 2,418
University of Washington, Biodesign Research, Google DeepMind
Sequence-based designFinds amino acid sequences compatible with a target structure; sequence fit does not guarantee the desired function or stability. 1,042
Google DeepMind, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Zhejiang University

Funding and investment

$622B
Disclosed private funding, 49 rounds in the last 24 months
$173.6M
Public grant funding since 2020, across 210 grants
56
Startups active in the last 24 months

Recent funding rounds

Jul 2027
Astrazeneca United Kingdom
$135MExpansion
Feb 2026
Indiana University United States · The Pfizer Foundation
$5MGrant
Month 20XX
Hidden organization Country · investors
$00MSeries X
Month 20XX
Hidden organization Country · investors
$00MSeries X
See all 30 rounds, with investors and amounts

Recorded grant funding since 2020 totals $173,599,290 across 210 grants.

Patent landscape

Top patent holders · last 24 months
Genentech
10
Hoffmann-La Roche
6
Iowa State University Research Foundation
4
University of Washington
3
Fujitsu Limited
3
See every patent holder and their full portfolio

Recent developments

Latest news, duplicates removed
  • Sep 2026
    NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) has announced the integration of its BioNeMo Agent Toolkit with Anthropic’s Claude Science AI workbench, enabling advanced protein structure prediction workflows. This collaboration leverages…
    Blockchain News
  • Aug 2026
    Via mindstudio.ai Anthropic’s Claude autonomously designs protein binders, achieving 27% hit rate The AI company's new Claude Science platform integrates over 60 scientific databases to handle end-to-end protein design…
    Crypto Briefing
  • Aug 2026
    Subscribe to Anthropic Science Features on AI-assisted discoveries, practical workflows, and field notes across the sciences. Summary: In this post, we share two results that show how Claude can help life scientists…
    Home \ Anthropic
  • Jul 2026
    Citation: Greener JG (2026) Where next for structural bioinformatics? PLoS Biol 24(7): e3003903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003903 Published: July 27, 2026 Copyright: © 2026 Joe G. Greener. This is an open…
    PLOS Biology
  • Month 20XX
    Hidden development
    Available to registered users with alerts enabled.
Get alerts for new protein structure prediction and de novo protein design developments

Frequently asked questions about protein structure prediction and de novo protein design

What companies are working on protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?

Google DeepMind and Nvidia are major corporate players; startup names include Generate Biomedicines Inc, A Alpha Bio Inc., and Profluent Bio Inc. Google DeepMind is associated with deep-learning structure prediction, while Generate Biomedicines and Profluent develop generative protein-design methods. A Alpha Bio launched Atlas, a platform for protein-interaction data.

Which protein structure prediction and de novo protein design startups are promising in 2026?

Generate Biomedicines Inc, A Alpha Bio Inc., and Profluent Bio Inc. are identified startups in this field. Generate Biomedicines has patented a diffusion-model system for de novo protein generation. A Alpha Bio launched Atlas in July 2026 to provide protein-interaction data, while Profluent develops AI methods for protein and antibody sequence design.

Which universities and research centers lead protein structure prediction and de novo protein design research?

The University of Washington, University of California, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology are prominent research organizations in the field. Recent work also comes from Shanghai JiaoTong University and Zhejiang University. Their reported directions include generative design, sequence design, protein binders, inverse folding, and joint optimization of protein structure and sequence.

How much funding has protein structure prediction and de novo protein design received?

Recorded grant funding since 2020 totals $173,599,290 across 210 grants. This figure describes grant records, not a complete measure of investment in the field. The available funding-round data also includes entries that may not represent protein-design-specific financing, so it should not be treated as an equivalent total.

Who holds the most protein structure prediction and de novo protein design patents?

Genentech leads the listed patent holders with 10 patents, followed by Hoffmann-La Roche with 6. Iowa State University Research Foundation holds 4. The University of Washington, Fujitsu Limited, Nvidia, Novozymes AS, and The Regents of The University Of California each have 3 listed patents.

Is protein structure prediction and de novo protein design patent activity growing?

Patent activity is down: 142 patents were recorded in the 24-month window, with growth of -52.1%. This contrasts with publication activity, which reached 4,048 publications in the last year and grew 46.6%. The difference suggests research output is expanding faster than patenting in the measured period.

How mature is protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?

Structure prediction is an established research capability, while designing proteins that work reliably remains an active technical challenge. The field recorded 4,048 publications in the last year, up 46.6%, alongside ongoing work on function, dynamics and experimental validation. Recent design studies target practical outputs such as binders, enzymes and imaging proteins.

What are the latest developments in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?

Recent developments include HighMorph, reported by Zhejiang University of Technology in September 2026, for interaction-guided cyclic-peptide sequence design. Shanghai JiaoTong University researchers reported a de novo binder for [NiFe]-hydrogenase that same month. In September 2026, NVIDIA also announced integration of its BioNeMo Agent Toolkit with Anthropic’s Claude Science workbench.

What are the main approaches in protein structure prediction and de novo protein design, and how do they differ?

The main approaches are Template-based modeling, Physics-based folding, Deep-learning structure prediction, Generative design, and Sequence-based design. Template-based methods use related structures, while physics-based methods score conformations using energy models. Deep learning predicts structure from learned patterns; generative methods create candidates, and sequence-based design seeks sequences compatible with a target structure.

What are the applications of protein structure prediction and de novo protein design?

Documented application areas include therapeutics and drug discovery (2,093 documents), antibodies and molecular binders (1,189), industrial enzymes (754), synthetic biology and agriculture (765), and structural biology (967). These methods can help develop or study molecules with targeted properties, but proposed designs need experimental testing to establish their activity and performance.

Go beyond the top 7

Discover and track organizations, patents, publications, grants, news and more. Get live alerts on new startups, funding rounds and emerging developments.